VIDA has published a comparison by gender of both bylines published and books reviewed by a wide range of magazines and journals. In a super accessible format, no less. Of course, the men are disproportionately represented in almost every area:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee975/ee975a6ad45b7a00c00c76fca71bff29e7cfd4a8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11931/11931d30bfcfcfe86d6f932b81f9a3914caad789" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17786/177860dde2ef1c96ed9198fdc2f36f541a8cc7df" alt=""
Depressing, no? Cue the rash of quasi-misogynist explanations and rationalizations for this phenomenon. Women just aren't assertive enough when pursuing publishing opportunities. Women just tend to write chick-lit, and not the real serious important stuff the public is really interested in. Etc, etc, blah, blah, blah.
Seriously, 3-D pie charts?
ReplyDeleteYeah, also sad about the disparity. But still.